Formulation of the main thesis. (It’s necessary to point out the central question of the work, the most notable idea of creativity)
Summary of the work. (In this paragraph, you do not need to retell the storyline.) It is necessary to give an overall assessment of the work.To tell what the author showed skill and skill.What exactly is the author’s merit.What innovations did he introduce his work.What exactly did the reader expand on the central problem )
Disadvantages, shortcomings. (It should be noted what exactly you had doubts about: what could you attribute to the shortcomings of the text: Do these errors reduce the level of the literary work.Do you need to highlight these shortcomings with wishes for further development of the author’s work, or are they so critical that the author is better drink poison)
Conclusions. (Here you can indicate the originality or secondary nature of the idea.) To draw conclusions about new stages of the author’s work)
The popularity of the dissertation titleis due to the brevity of its form. The reader can get some impression of the book, not naigrano-enthusiastic, which gives him the annotation of the publisher, but detached-subjective.
Feedback gives only a general description of the work without detailed analysis, but contains practical recommendations. Feedback is the most common type of criticism that can be found on the Internet.
Principles of review. The impetus to creating a dissertation titleis always the need to express one’s attitude to what has been read, an attempt to understand your impressions caused by the work, but on the basis of elementary knowledge in the theory of literature, a detailed analysis of the work. The reader can say about the book or the viewed “like-dislike” movie without proof, and the reviewer must thoroughly substantiate his opinion with profound and reasoned analysis. The quality of the analysis depends on the theoretical and professional preparation of the reviewer, his depth of understanding of the subject, his ability to analyze objectively. between the reviewer and the author – a creative dialogue with an equal position of the parties. The author’s “I” manifests itself openly to rationally, logically and emotionally influence the reader. Therefore, the reviewer uses language tools that combine the functions of naming and evaluation, book and colloquial words and constructions. Criticism does not study literature, but judges it – in order to form a reader’s, public attitude to these or other writers, to actively influence the course of the literary process.